Danzu Editorial Policy

Sources and checks

We prefer current product documentation, official pricing and App Store listings for capabilities, platform requirements and prices. A source date means the specific claim was checked on that date; it does not mean we tested every feature. Country-specific prices must identify the storefront.

Vendor claims are not test results

Where a competitor describes a capability, that is a vendor claim unless we document a hands-on test. We do not call a product “tested” based only on reading its website. Recommendations distinguish lessons, games, reference matching and reference-free feedback because they solve different practice problems.

Examples and customer proof

Illustrative screenshots, sample logs and simulated examples must be labeled. Customer results require permission and a documented method. We do not invent testimonials, ratings, expert reviewers or improvements. Automated scores do not establish artistic quality or safe technique.

Authorship

Product content is published by Danzu. The publisher profile identifies responsibility without implying dance-teaching credentials. Named external reviewers appear only when their contribution and permission are recorded.

Updates and corrections

We update content when facts or explanations change. A date change alone is not a substantive review. Report a specific claim, its URL and a supporting source through support; we will evaluate the evidence and correct errors.